|
|
|
|
Lord Rethion generated a random number between
1 and 20000 ...
9030!
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
locke317 generated a random number between
1 and 20000 ...
9372!
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Rethion generated a random number between
1 and 20000 ...
12380!
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:09 pm
I am SO tired of getting like 30 away from a thousand..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
locke317 generated a random number between
1 and 20000 ...
18960!
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:10 pm
Girl Who Sings Lord Setar Girl Who Sings Lady Yazoo Girl Who Sings 1. Go to your abortionist clinic and ask how many times you can legally have an abortion for your proof 2. if you didnt want to carry a pregnancy to term why risk getting pregnant? Condoms are fault clause of unmarried sex and so are STDs, abortions are the result of promiscuousness. And if you're unable to be pregnant you shouldn't fool around. Um, honey, promiscuity isn't definite. There's not even a shown connection between promiscuity and STD's because the promiscuos tend to be careful. it still doesnt give them an excuse to be having sex So sex is solely for reproduction? That statement requires proof, please give some. Animals use sex for reproduction. We being primates are animals. Thus sex is for reproduction. (when the hell did this turn into a debate? you started of asking my oppinion and you keep asking for proof of my opinion?) While the logic is good, the fact basis is not. Moniquill The Purpose of SexSex isn't just for reproduction. People do not have sex because they want babies, they have sex because sex fosters pair bonds. Sex, among humans (And most other intelligent species for that matter) is first and foremost a social interaction. Without sex, one's adult life will be stunted in a serious way. Lack of sex, or even lack of sexual desire, is considered a psychological disorder and can lead to other much nastier complications. Also, if sex is just for reproduction, why do humans still exhibit sexual desire in cases where no conception could possibly take place? Why don't we mate like, say, dogs, wherein females go into estrus and mate only during that time? If sex is only for reproduction, it has an AMAZING failure rate. species that have sex like crazy even when there's little to no chance of breeding: European kestrels red-sided garter snakes alpine accentors razorbills American Southwest or Hawaiian whiptail lizards (these reproduce asexually, but have very active sex lives anyway) cichlids purple swamp hens/pukikos Eurasian oystercatchers several species of gulls tree swallows orange-fronted parakeets sheep dolphins deer gazelles Japanese macaques bonobos lemurs (source: Diversity's rainbow: diversity, gender, and sexuality in nature and people, Joan Roughgarden (2004).) About AbstinenceSomething anyone should read up about failure rates of abstinence: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/tgr/06/5/gr060504.htmlQuote: When does abstinence fail? The definition of an abstinence user also has implications for determining the effectiveness of abstinence as a method of contraception. The president, in his July 2002 remarks to South Carolina high school students, said "Let me just be perfectly plain. If you're worried about teenage pregnancy, or if you're worried about sexually transmitted disease, abstinence works every single time." In doing so, he suggested that abstinence is 100% effective. But scientifically, is this in fact correct? Researchers have two different ways of measuring the effectiveness of contraceptive methods. "Perfect use" measures the effectiveness when a contraceptive is used exactly according to clinical guidelines. In contrast, "typical use" measures how effective a method is for the average person who does not always use the method correctly or consistently. For example, women who use oral contraceptives perfectly will experience almost complete protection against pregnancy. However, in the real world, many women find it difficult to take a pill every single day, and pregnancies can and do occur to women who miss one or more pills during a cycle. Thus, while oral contraceptives have a perfect-use effectiveness rate of over 99%, their typical-use effectiveness is closer to 92% (see chart). As a result, eight in 100 women who use oral contraceptives will become pregnant in the first year of use. Perfect use of abstinence means never having any sexual intercourse. Typical use of abstinence means how it is typically used. A couple who heavy pet and the guy ejaculates onto the v****a resulting in the girl getting pregnant would be a "typical" use of abstinence that has "failed." A girl getting raped and then getting pregnant would be a failure of abstinence because her method of "contraceptive" failed to prevent pregnancy (if one could call "rape" a typical use). A couple willingly choosing to have sex when they have asserted a want to be abstinent would be a typical use of abstinence that fails. I.E. A couple that says "I want to be abstinent until marraige," who then go out and have sex have practiced abstinence, but not perfect use. If the girl got pregnant this would be a failure of abstinence. Just like condoms are something like 90% effective "typical use" and 99% "perfect use" abstinence works the same way. When people ******** while claiming to be abstinent, it's typical use. Abstinence does have a failure rate. May I ask why you are pro-life? A lot of people who are are usually so because of misinformation, I seem to find.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Rethion generated a random number between
1 and 20000 ...
3190!
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:10 pm
Has anyone played First Encounter Assault Recon? (F.E.A.R)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Rethion generated a random number between
1 and 20000 ...
12878!
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Setar generated a random number between
1 and 20000 ...
1994!
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:12 pm
Lord Rethion Has anyone played First Encounter Assault Recon? (F.E.A.R) Not interested in those games really.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
locke317 generated a random number between
1 and 20000 ...
7246!
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:13 pm
Lord Setar Girl Who Sings Lord Setar Girl Who Sings Lady Yazoo Um, honey, promiscuity isn't definite. There's not even a shown connection between promiscuity and STD's because the promiscuos tend to be careful. it still doesnt give them an excuse to be having sex So sex is solely for reproduction? That statement requires proof, please give some. Animals use sex for reproduction. We being primates are animals. Thus sex is for reproduction. (when the hell did this turn into a debate? you started of asking my oppinion and you keep asking for proof of my opinion?) While the logic is good, the fact basis is not. Moniquill The Purpose of SexSex isn't just for reproduction. People do not have sex because they want babies, they have sex because sex fosters pair bonds. Sex, among humans (And most other intelligent species for that matter) is first and foremost a social interaction. Without sex, one's adult life will be stunted in a serious way. Lack of sex, or even lack of sexual desire, is considered a psychological disorder and can lead to other much nastier complications. Also, if sex is just for reproduction, why do humans still exhibit sexual desire in cases where no conception could possibly take place? Why don't we mate like, say, dogs, wherein females go into estrus and mate only during that time? If sex is only for reproduction, it has an AMAZING failure rate. species that have sex like crazy even when there's little to no chance of breeding: European kestrels red-sided garter snakes alpine accentors razorbills American Southwest or Hawaiian whiptail lizards (these reproduce asexually, but have very active sex lives anyway) cichlids purple swamp hens/pukikos Eurasian oystercatchers several species of gulls tree swallows orange-fronted parakeets sheep dolphins deer gazelles Japanese macaques bonobos lemurs (source: Diversity's rainbow: diversity, gender, and sexuality in nature and people, Joan Roughgarden (2004).) About AbstinenceSomething anyone should read up about failure rates of abstinence: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/tgr/06/5/gr060504.htmlQuote: When does abstinence fail? The definition of an abstinence user also has implications for determining the effectiveness of abstinence as a method of contraception. The president, in his July 2002 remarks to South Carolina high school students, said "Let me just be perfectly plain. If you're worried about teenage pregnancy, or if you're worried about sexually transmitted disease, abstinence works every single time." In doing so, he suggested that abstinence is 100% effective. But scientifically, is this in fact correct? Researchers have two different ways of measuring the effectiveness of contraceptive methods. "Perfect use" measures the effectiveness when a contraceptive is used exactly according to clinical guidelines. In contrast, "typical use" measures how effective a method is for the average person who does not always use the method correctly or consistently. For example, women who use oral contraceptives perfectly will experience almost complete protection against pregnancy. However, in the real world, many women find it difficult to take a pill every single day, and pregnancies can and do occur to women who miss one or more pills during a cycle. Thus, while oral contraceptives have a perfect-use effectiveness rate of over 99%, their typical-use effectiveness is closer to 92% (see chart). As a result, eight in 100 women who use oral contraceptives will become pregnant in the first year of use. Perfect use of abstinence means never having any sexual intercourse. Typical use of abstinence means how it is typically used. A couple who heavy pet and the guy ejaculates onto the v****a resulting in the girl getting pregnant would be a "typical" use of abstinence that has "failed." A girl getting raped and then getting pregnant would be a failure of abstinence because her method of "contraceptive" failed to prevent pregnancy (if one could call "rape" a typical use). A couple willingly choosing to have sex when they have asserted a want to be abstinent would be a typical use of abstinence that fails. I.E. A couple that says "I want to be abstinent until marraige," who then go out and have sex have practiced abstinence, but not perfect use. If the girl got pregnant this would be a failure of abstinence. Just like condoms are something like 90% effective "typical use" and 99% "perfect use" abstinence works the same way. When people ******** while claiming to be abstinent, it's typical use. Abstinence does have a failure rate. May I ask why you are pro-life? A lot of people who are are usually so because of misinformation, I seem to find. Because i was an accident. I would not exhist had they taken the easy way out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Rethion generated a random number between
1 and 20000 ...
10903!
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:13 pm
Lord Setar Lord Rethion Has anyone played First Encounter Assault Recon? (F.E.A.R) Not interested in those games really. Ah... Nevermind then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
locke317 generated a random number between
1 and 20000 ...
12216!
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
locke317 generated a random number between
1 and 20000 ...
9446!
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Rethion generated a random number between
1 and 20000 ...
13832!
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:15 pm
Wait.. Pro choice GAIANS ? are you implying that gaians can have intercourse? Or that people who use gaia shouldn't..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord Rethion generated a random number between
1 and 20000 ...
384!
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:16 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|