|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 9:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 12:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 3:58 pm
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
Kenutsu Yasashiku What is nothing? Nothing is the absense of everything. When everything is gone, nothing is left. So can nothing exist physically? The answer is no. If you get rid of all the heat, all the light, all the matter, all the movement ect. You still have things. Getting rid of heat leaves you with cold, ridding yourself of light yealds darkness. Having no matter leaves you with emptyness, and no movement is still ness. ((Basically all of them combined is a lack of energy, except perhaps matter... )) anyway... theere is also time. I have no idea how you can get ride of it because even nothing can be marked by time. Can you find nothing or have nothing? Yes. Now this does not contradict the above paragraph for the simple fact that nothing EXISTS as an IDEA, and an idea is not a physical object. Nothing is an idea that describes something that does not exist. So what is true nothing? The answer is I have no earthly or unearthly clue. Because true nothing cannot exist, there for we cannot think of it, cannot speak of it, cannot even imagine it because true nothing never has and never will exist in any way what so ever. Because if it does it ceices to be nothing and becomes something. Well, I hope that is not too wordy for you all.
burning_eyes
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:48 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
Wow.
I've read through just about this entire thread, and I gotta say I love all the partially-informed realists in this guild. I also love the two dozen poorly formed answers to the question. Seriously people, think it out or don't answer.
I also have a question, since this forum is for philosophy: why is it that everyone supposes that, because we label nothingness as 'nothing' it automatically becomes something? Why can't there be the abstract, of which the name and definition are substantial, but in the world outside of a dictionary it truly is indefineable? Why must everyone say that nothing is a paradox, being something and nothing at the same time? And what ever happened to people actually lining two sides of an argument equally, instead of jumping into the same lake?
^^ Feel free to yell, scream, or otherwise discuss. Just don't flame. You could get banned.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 11:40 pm
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
Intelife I also have a question, since this forum is for philosophy: why is it that everyone supposes that, because we label nothingness as 'nothing' it automatically becomes something? Why can't there be the abstract, of which the name and definition are substantial, but in the world outside of a dictionary it truly is indefineable? Why must everyone say that nothing is a paradox, being something and nothing at the same time? And what ever happened to people actually lining two sides of an argument equally, instead of jumping into the same lake?
I agree that in putting a label on nothing that we have indeed made it something. this creates the paradox that when we recognize nothing we see the absence of something and label it as nothing; thus, in turn we have made it something. For the absence things is surely something.
The conclusion that i have reached here is that nothing is in fact something. Nothing is the label we have given to the absence of matter, energy, thought, etc...
by its own definition, nothing is a paradox. For the very existence of the word is something. To truly have an absolute emptiness one would have to expunge all matter, space, time, energy, and thought, and then it would have to have no names or labels. And it could not be known, for one cannot know nothing.
|
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:59 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 5:07 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:45 pm
|
|
|
|
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|