Welcome to Gaia! ::

Why Not?

Back to Guilds

No rules, just Fun! Join today. 

Tags: Roleplaying, Polls, Spam 

Reply "IDT" Intelligent Discussion Threads!
Extinction of the Human Race Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 4

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Devastun Jarrous

PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 4:26 pm
Kachan36
In the roughly 4.6 billion years since the formation of the Earth, there has been life on it for approximately 3.8 billion years. Humans first evolved about 5 million years ago. That's about one one-thousandth of 3.8 billion years. We've occupied the planet for about .1% of the time that life has occupied it.

In those nearly 4 billion years, life has gone from simple one-celled creatures, to multicellular, vertebrate species and later to mammals and primates, our closest relatives. And of all the species we know of, more than 90% are now extinct. That's how life remains on this planet, it evolves. We are selfish to even imagine that humans are somehow the intended end result of evolution. We will become extinct just like every other species that has come before us--most likely after a new species evolves from our genetic material.

In short, it is not only beneficial for the planet that humans eventually succumb to extinction, it is also necessary for the continuation of life on the planet.


wow, right again. The fact is folks, we're long overdue for ANOTHER mass extinction. That's right, another, and it won't be the last either. This planet has seen dominant and powerful species before and now they're only visible through the evolution of modern creatures like the birds, the crocodilians, the arachnids, and the fish. These are the true survivors that mammals far later came into contact with. As mammals, we have the tools to endure the harsh realities of global death, sustained body heat, being omnivorous, possessing the capacity to plan, and the several traits that made primates so successful, but this and the many generations before it have become too soft and comfortable to really use these tools to their maximum benefit. During less catastrophic occurrences, we go into a panic or sometimes lose all order and become riotous. Some of the more calculating of us turn being opportunistic to all out greed for a means to live. "Developed" humans are now ill equipped to handle the violent and inevitable changes of the world and the ever influential presence of space. In what seems the end, the "un-developed" nations would most likely have the essential baser instincts to survive a global threat, living "closer to the earth." They know how to live on the very limits of catastrophe. Observe any epidemic. They will suffer the most loss, but gain the absolute protection against the ills. Modernized humanity I'm sad to say will be overcome and die away, but that is the way of the world and it's for the best. The weak have to die to let the strong grow to the highest potential point of evolution unabated. We were just a "mutation" derived from this more effective path, a detour if you will. Natural selection will see to it that the path is corrected soon enough.  
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 4:38 pm
Yaoi_miroku
well no. dogs and cats will go extinct as well since they survive off of food that is made through the labor of humans. a lot of others animals that live through similar means of survival will be extinct as well. humans also try to protect wildlife and such from going extinct. i do not know everything that would take effect if humans were to become extinct but i feel like a lot of bad effects will take place

Interesting topic by the way 3nodding smile


These animals are not reliant on us completely, rather, they are advantageous of us. After all available food and water sources are depleted (within the home) the weaker smaller ones unable to escape their confines will die and the rest will regroup outside and continue their intended path as carnivores, hunting each other and competing for survival. Those in zoos will be die off which is ironic since zoos are meant to conserve, but anything that can get outside will be just fine without humans. No worries miss smile Remember folks doggy and cat doors are your friends, so your furry four-legged friends will stand a chance when you bite the big one smile  

Devastun Jarrous


Britainian_Knight

PostPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:09 am
Devastun Jarrous
Kachan36
In the roughly 4.6 billion years since the formation of the Earth, there has been life on it for approximately 3.8 billion years. Humans first evolved about 5 million years ago. That's about one one-thousandth of 3.8 billion years. We've occupied the planet for about .1% of the time that life has occupied it.

In those nearly 4 billion years, life has gone from simple one-celled creatures, to multicellular, vertebrate species and later to mammals and primates, our closest relatives. And of all the species we know of, more than 90% are now extinct. That's how life remains on this planet, it evolves. We are selfish to even imagine that humans are somehow the intended end result of evolution. We will become extinct just like every other species that has come before us--most likely after a new species evolves from our genetic material.

In short, it is not only beneficial for the planet that humans eventually succumb to extinction, it is also necessary for the continuation of life on the planet.


wow, right again. The fact is folks, we're long overdue for ANOTHER mass extinction. That's right, another, and it won't be the last either. This planet has seen dominant and powerful species before and now they're only visible through the evolution of modern creatures like the birds, the crocodilians, the arachnids, and the fish. These are the true survivors that mammals far later came into contact with. As mammals, we have the tools to endure the harsh realities of global death, sustained body heat, being omnivorous, possessing the capacity to plan, and the several traits that made primates so successful, but this and the many generations before it have become too soft and comfortable to really use these tools to their maximum benefit. During less catastrophic occurrences, we go into a panic or sometimes lose all order and become riotous. Some of the more calculating of us turn being opportunistic to all out greed for a means to live. "Developed" humans are now ill equipped to handle the violent and inevitable changes of the world and the ever influential presence of space. In what seems the end, the "un-developed" nations would most likely have the essential baser instincts to survive a global threat, living "closer to the earth." They know how to live on the very limits of catastrophe. Observe any epidemic. They will suffer the most loss, but gain the absolute protection against the ills. Modernized humanity I'm sad to say will be overcome and die away, but that is the way of the world and it's for the best. The weak have to die to let the strong grow to the highest potential point of evolution unabated. We were just a "mutation" derived from this more effective path, a detour if you will. Natural selection will see to it that the path is corrected soon enough.

wow, so much perversion of what is realistic. what you seem to be saying is that our own intelligence will cause those without it to outlive us? instinct will somehow protect people than reasoning against disaster? and for us to go extinct i can say with all certainty that it will only happen after we exhaust every other possible option, so even if it is hopeless we will slaughter every sort of animal to find a cure, feed ourselves, give us more oxygen, etc. until we either die out or restore some form of balance. could the world be better without us? probably. will it be better after us? no way in hell.  
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:28 pm
Humans are practically a blight to mother earth. everywhere weve gone there have been extinctions and harm to the planet. Our technology just makes us more efficient killers and eventually were gonna wipe each other out. and the animals will watch from the sidelines and laugh even as theyre destroyed along with us  

Mr Jekyll


fake passport

PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:15 pm
yes because cats hate us. ive seen that documentary "cats and dogs."  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:58 pm
I actually belive that the full on EXTINCTION would be better for the environment (it's seriously a proven fact that we are the source of most environmental problems). But, the human race being wiped completely would screw up the food chain (we're on TOP, baby!) with a whole chain of events that I don't quite understand. I belive that we should go with a sort of Rsident Evil 5 Uroboro thing (without becoming a giant, hulking, snake monster!), where only people who will one day matter stay alive.  

Sir Francis XLII


Paradoxismminant

PostPosted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:27 pm
It probably would benefit the Earth and all that's left for humans to go extinct. We tend to overuse resources, corrupt what we have left, and basically speed up the run of our world towards destruction.

That being said, please note that I said "tend"--some of us do try to conserve resources and keep the balance. I can think of no species that will go completely extinct without us. Some species will get picked off, in fact, because of the way we've bred them--dogs with short legs and crushed snouts, for instance. Mice and pets will go back to the way they were before human domestication.

There will be (probably) no oil spills, or factories pumping out fumes that mix with air or feathers and cause acid rain and suffocation, because there will be no people to run the factories and ram petroleum-filled vessels into things.

Just a few points.  
Reply
"IDT" Intelligent Discussion Threads!

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 4
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum